We Built It First. Now We’re Raising to Scale the Future of Intelligence.

We built it first. Now we're raising to scale the Future of Intelligence. Why we're raising $1.5M to scale anticipatory intelligence, after proving it works

For the past year, I’ve been quietly building RAKSHA. Not as a theory, but as a working intelligence system. No funding. No shortcuts. Just real clients, real risks, and hard-won proof that something better is possible.

Now, we’re raising capital to scale what comes next: the Quiet Fracture Protocol. This is our proprietary rupture intelligence engine that surfaces geopolitical, financial, and narrative threats before they detonate.

RAKSHA is built for people who actually have to make decisions in fragile systems—not just model them. Our work spans geopolitical realignments, reputational collapse, climate-conflict convergence, and the power games embedded in aid, infrastructure, and finance.

We've already proven the model through paid client work across three continents. This raise isn't about testing a theory. It's about scaling what works.

We've already proven market demand through client delivery and advisory work. The investors who move first get access to intelligence infrastructure that others will spend years trying to replicate. This raise isn't about testing a theory. It's about scaling what works.

If you’re a funder, partner, or just someone who sees what’s coming, we’re looking for allies who act before it breaks.

And if you’d like to amplify our raise, here’s the LinkedIn post. For women of color founders building without inherited networks or institutional backing, visibility isn’t about ego. It’s about access. Amplification shapes perception, and perception shapes capital. It helps open the doors that legacy players walk through without asking.

We’re not chasing hype. We’re building the next generation of intelligence, for a world already in fracture.

RAKSHA isn't predicting the future. We're building the intelligence to navigate it, before the rupture hits. The question isn't if the next rupture is coming. It's whether you'll see it first.